xiangqiplay

棋逢对手

Loading…
Skip to content
Xiangqi Piece Values: What Every Piece Is Really Worth

Xiangqi piece values explained: approximate points for the Chariot, Cannon, Horse and more, and how each piece's worth shifts with the position.

Xiangqi piece values are commonly cited as roughly 9 points for the Chariot, about 4.5 for the Cannon, about 4 for the Horse, about 2 each for the Advisor and Elephant, and 1 for a Soldier that rises to about 2 once it crosses the river. The General is priceless, since checkmating it ends the game.

These numbers are approximations, and different books and coaches weigh the pieces a little differently. More importantly, the real value of any piece depends on the position in front of you. This guide explains how the figures shift through the game and how to use them when judging trades in Chinese Chess (象棋 / Cờ Tướng).

The commonly cited values

The Chariot sits at the top of the scale, usually given around 9 points. It moves any distance along a rank or file, is never hobbled or dependent on a screen, and crosses the river freely. It is the piece beginners are taught to develop early and guard carefully.

The Cannon is usually rated around 4.5 and the Horse around 4, although many sources simply treat them as roughly equal. The Cannon moves like a Chariot but captures only by jumping over exactly one piece, called a screen. The Horse moves one point straight and then one point diagonally outward, and it can be blocked, or hobbled, by any piece sitting on the point directly next to it in the direction it wants to go.

The Advisor and the Elephant are each valued around 2. Advisors never leave the palace and Elephants never cross the river, so neither can join an attack. Their worth is almost entirely defensive, which is exactly why their value swings so much depending on what the opponent still has. The Soldier is valued at 1 on its own side of the river and around 2 after crossing, when it gains the ability to move sideways.

The General has no number. It can never be traded, and checkmating or stalemating it ends the game.

The Soldier's shifting value

No piece changes value as dramatically as the Soldier. Before crossing the river it can only step straight forward, one point at a time, so it is slow and easy to block or pick off. In the opening it mostly serves as a shield for its own side and as a screen for Cannons.

Once it crosses the river, the Soldier can also move one point sideways. That extra freedom makes it much harder to stop, and a crossed Soldier near the enemy palace can pressure the Advisors, cover the General's escape points, and support mating attacks. This is why the commonly cited figure roughly doubles after crossing.

The value drops again when a Soldier reaches the enemy back rank. Soldiers never move backward, so on the last rank the piece can only shuffle sideways and often loses most of its attacking power. For that reason it is frequently better to keep an advanced Soldier a rank or two short of the back rank, where it still controls important points around the palace.

Two crossed Soldiers standing side by side, or close enough to support each other, are worth more than two separate Soldiers. Together they can advance on the palace in tandem and restrict the enemy General in ways a single Soldier cannot. In some endgames a well placed pair of connected Soldiers can be as useful as a Horse or a Cannon, so judge them as a unit rather than simply adding up their individual points.

Cannon versus Horse: why the game phase matters

The small gap between the Cannon and the Horse on paper hides a much bigger swing in practice. The Cannon needs a screen to capture. In the opening and middlegame, when the board is crowded, screens are everywhere and the Cannon becomes a fearsome long-range attacker. The Central Cannon opening, which moves a Cannon to the middle file on the very first move, shows how much pressure a single Cannon can create early on.

The Horse suffers in those same crowded positions. Every nearby piece is a potential hobble, and it can take several moves to reposition. As pieces come off the board, the situation reverses. Screens become scarce, so the Cannon struggles to find targets, while the Horse finally has open points to move through and can approach the enemy General from angles that are hard to block.

This is the reasoning behind a common piece of advice: in the endgame, a Horse is usually worth more than a Cannon. It is a tendency, not a law. A Cannon with a reliable screen, such as a friendly Advisor or a well placed Soldier, can stay dangerous deep into the endgame, and a Horse trapped behind its own pieces can be nearly useless in the middlegame. Judge the specific position, but let the phase of the game tilt your estimate.

Advisors and Elephants: value that depends on the attacker

Because Advisors and Elephants cannot attack, beginners often treat them as spare change. Their real value depends on what your opponent still has on the board. Against an army with Horses and Cannons, your defenders are what keep the palace closed. Elephants control key points in front of the palace and can step in to block attacks along the files, while Advisors guard the points around the General and help shut out Horse checks.

A full set of two Advisors and two Elephants is remarkably resilient. Many endings that look winning on material alone are known to be difficult or impossible to convert against a complete defensive set. A lone Chariot, for example, is generally unable to force checkmate against a General protected by both Advisors and both Elephants, even though by the usual numbers the Chariot is worth more than all four defenders combined.

The reverse also holds. Once your opponent has traded off most of their attackers, your defenders matter less, and an Advisor or Elephant may be worth giving up for activity or to win material elsewhere. The question to ask is always what the defender is defending against. If the answer is nothing, its value shrinks. If the answer is a Horse and a Cannon hovering near your palace, its value grows.

Using piece values to judge trades

Values are most useful as a quick check before you exchange. The clearest rule is not to give a Chariot for a Horse or a Cannon unless you get something concrete in return, such as a forced checkmate, a decisive attack, or winning further material immediately. On the common scale that swap costs you roughly four to five points, and few positional factors are large enough to make up the difference.

A Chariot for a Horse and a Cannon together is a different story. The totals are close, and the right choice depends on the position. Two smaller attackers working together can be very strong in a middlegame attack, while the Chariot tends to shine in open positions and in endgames. Neither side of that trade is automatically wrong.

Trading a Horse for a Cannon is usually about even, so the decision rests on the phase of the game and the structure. Keep the Cannon while screens are plentiful and an attack is building, and lean toward the Horse as the board empties. When you win a defender such as an Advisor, count what the capture opens up: its real value is often the weakness it leaves behind, not the two points on paper.

Finally, remember that time and safety sit outside the numbers. A trade that is even in points but lets your opponent develop a Chariot with gain of time, or pulls apart your defensive structure, can be a losing trade in practice.

How xiangqi values differ from Western chess

Players coming from Western chess usually know the familiar scale of 1 for a pawn, 3 for a knight or bishop, 5 for a rook, and 9 for a queen, with the same caveat that these are rough guides. The xiangqi scale looks similar on the surface but reflects a very different army.

The biggest difference is at the top. Xiangqi has no queen, and the Chariot, which moves exactly like a rook, is the strongest piece on the board. Because the other xiangqi pieces are more restricted, with Horses that can be hobbled, Cannons that need screens, and defenders locked into their own zones, the Chariot stands much further above them than a rook does above a knight. That is why it is often valued close to a Horse and a Cannon combined.

The second difference is the role of purely defensive pieces. In Western chess almost every piece can eventually join an attack. In xiangqi, Advisors and Elephants never can, yet they may decide whether a material advantage is winning at all. Finally, the xiangqi Soldier changes value in a way a chess pawn does not. It becomes far more useful on crossing the river, and it never promotes, so a Soldier on the last rank is a weaker piece rather than a new queen.

Practice on XiangqiPlay

Piece values become intuitive only with experience. Next time you consider a trade, pause and add up the common figures, then ask how the position changes them: how many screens remain for the Cannons, how free the Horses are, and how complete each side's defensive set is.

The free puzzle library on XiangqiPlay is a good place to sharpen that judgment. It holds 5,000 engine-proven mate puzzles, and mate puzzles are a natural place to see positions where the material count says one thing and the checkmate says another. When you are ready to test your trades in full games, create a free account and play the computer at beginner, intermediate, or advanced level, or invite a friend and compare your evaluations afterward.

X

XiangqiPlay Team

XiangqiPlay newsroom